That Council adopts the following definition
of community development: ‘communities
finding their own priorities and then
meeting the needs themselves but with
help where necessary’. A shorthand form is:
‘supporting community initiatives’.
Council should support
community initiatives wherever possible
provided that they are well targeted and
efficiently implemented and in line with
the objectives of the Council’s Community
Strategy.
There should be
a gradual further shift of Council resources
into community development which has an
important role in making sure that the
Community Strategy is based on real need
and implemented efficiently.
The workload of Area Coordinators should
be reviewed and additional or redeployed
staff should be appointed on an area basis
so that our profile in each area is increased.
Such staff may have specific expertise which
can be drawn on by colleagues as needed.
That Cabinet authorise the Chief Executive to finalise the restructuring of posts in line
with the recommendations here. Because of
temporary vacancies this can be done at no
net cost.
All officers with Area based community
development responsibilities should be
trained in facilitation and mediation skills
and understanding of the voluntary sector.
The role of members in
supporting community initiatives should be
strengthened by raising their awareness of,
and involvement in, the opportunities.
Almost all officers have meetings with
the public and should be ready to act
as first contact in supporting community
initiatives. Their awareness of opportunities
should be increased so that the community
development approach becomes part of
the Council’s philosophy. Staff need to
be introduced to this way of working at
induction and through training courses.
We should publish articles in ‘Partners’ and
local papers to raise public awareness of our
policy of supporting community initiatives
and of how to contact Area Coordinators,
members or officers on community issues.
The Council should strengthen its links with
partners in the voluntary and statutory
sectors to develop a network of community
development workers, in tandem with local
members, to stimulate the community
into developing initiatives and to support
initiatives when they come forward.
The Area Comunity
Committees should become more active in
supporting community initiatives in their
areas, discussing projects and progress. This
would strengthen the Area Community
Committees and improve their links with
parishes and the voluntary sector.
The Area Community Committee Project
Funds should be increased gradually as they
take on a more active role in supporting
community initiatives.
The recent changes in administering one-off
grants are to be welcomed, and further
reviews of grant policy should take account
of the evidence in Appendices 7, 11 and 14.
Further work is needed to map the
different community development activities
and community assets in villages and towns
and to identify the respective roles of
EHDC, HCC, parish and town councils and
Voluntary Action in East Hampshire.